Survey of Licensed Acupuncturists to Gather Information on Competencies for Practice
in Hospitals, Integrated Centers
and Other Conventional Healthcare Settings
Produced by the:
National Education Dialogue to Advance Integrated Health Care
Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care
For the:
Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium
Project Director:
John Weeks
Key Collaborators:
Pamela Snider, ND, Elizabeth Goldblatt, PhD, MPA/HA,
Catherine Niemiec, JD, LAc, Kory Ward-Cook, PhD,
Bryn Clark, LAc
Sponsor:
National Certification Commission for Acupuncture
and Oriental Medicine
January 2007
Survey of Licensed Acupuncturists to Gather Information on Competencies for Practice in Hospitals, Integrated Centers
and Other Conventional Healthcare Settings
Abstract: An increasing number of licensed practitioners of acupuncture and Oriental medicine (AOM) are working in environments where overall clinical decision-making is dominated by medical doctors. These include integrative medicine clinics, hospitals and community health centers. Survey: This survey and interview process was engaged to explore the competencies of AOM practitioners which best support their playing an optimal role in patient care in these settings. A three page survey was developed with reviews from two multi-disciplinary teams. Survey sections focuses on identifying useful training and quantifying the importance of a set of 25 topics in a session to prepare AOM practitioners. Participants: Forty-five (45) experienced practitioners were identified and emailed the survey; 26 (58%) participated, most of whose practice was entirely or principally in outpatient settings. Of these, 19 (76%) participated in a follow-up telephone interview. Findings: Preparation and resources were found to be uneven and often sketchy with a minority of participants noting valuable preparation in any of six different areas. Skills deemed to be “very important” by the greatest number of participants were the “recognition of high priority acute management clinical presentations” (76%), “useful medical language/medical terminology” (69%), “communication with MDs/nurses and other providers” (69%) and “skills in articulating to the MDs/staff the value I offer patients” (65%). Interviews yielded a useful perspective, especially among those clinicians who are also AOM educators, about the extent to which today’s AOM education according to current accreditation standard already prepares students for integrated practice. Conclusion: Written, web-based materials or review courses for those entering, or seeking to enter, integrated practice environment would be useful tools for those with this clinical interest. The survey was carried out through the National Education Dialogue to Advance Integrated Health Care and the Academic Consortium for Complementary Health Care. The project was supported by a grant from the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine.
Project Director: Weeks J1,2
Collaborators: Snider P1,2 , Goldblatt E1,2 , Niemiec C2, Ward-Cook K3, Clark B3
1 National Education Dialogue to Advance Integrated Health Care
2 Academic Consortium for Complementary Health Care.
3 National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine.
______________________
Introduction
An increasing number of licensed practitioners of acupuncture and Oriental medicine (AOM) are working in environments where overall clinical decision-making is dominated by medical doctors. These include outpatient integrative medicine clinics associated with academic health centers, health systems and community health institutions as well as, to a lesser extent, inpatient care in hospitals.
Facilitating the optimal role for complementary and alternative health care practitioners in patient care in such settings is an evolving challenge. The specific competencies which support optimal participation may be unknown to, or under-developed in, licensed AOM practitioners who are interested in engaging the challenges of practicing in these facilities. Educators interested in providing useful services which facilitate this integration may not know how to best shape their programs.
This survey project was developed with the goal of gleaning information from AOM practitioners who are experienced in these settings. The project sought to identify the types of competencies and tools which will best prepare other AOM professionals for making the most of these integrated care opportunities.
Project Leaders and Sponsors
This project was carried out through the National Education Dialogue to Advance Integrated Health Care: Creating Common Ground (NED) in concert with the Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care (ACCAHC). Both are initiatives developed by the multi-disciplinary Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium (IHPC) (www.ihpc.info) .
NED and ACCAHC share a common vision which includes the following statement: We envision a health care system that is multi-disciplinary and enhances competence, mutual respect and collaboration across all CAM and conventional health care disciplines. Priorities for NED efforts were set at a national NED gathering of 70 educators from 12 distinct disciplines. One on the nine priorities is to “develop an outline of skills and attitudes appropriate for those involved in collaborative integrated health care.” A second is to “create collaboratively-developed educational resources to prepare students and practitioners to practice in integrated clinical settings.” (NED Progress Report, 2004-2005)
This project was engaged to fulfill on these priorities. The project was supported by funds granted from the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (NCCAOM).
Selection of the AOM Clinicians
Individuals who were surveyed were all licensed acupuncturists who are practicing in integrated health environments. A subset was identified through queries to the leaders of NED and ACCAHC on their regular conference calls. Others were located through direct contact with various hospitals and educational centers. The search focused on AOM schools which offer the Doctor of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (DAOM) degree and academic health centers with integrative clinics which are members of the Consortium of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine (http://www.imconsortium.org/). A third subset was selected by project director Weeks based on his knowledge of health system integration initiatives gained through his work as the publisher-editor of the Integrator Blog News & Reports (www.theintegratorblog.com).
Survey Development and Interview Process
The survey was developed through a multi-disciplinary process which grew out of themes discovered in prior work of the multi-disciplinary NED and ACCAHC teams. The instrument was reviewed by representatives of NED, ACCAHC and NCCAOM and the survey was administered through e-mail. Non-responders were e-mailed a second and a third time to increase participation.
The instrument had three fields. The first focused on the respondent’s background, the second on specialized training they have had in the field, and the third on quantifying the level of importance of a set of competencies.
Interviewees were selected through a field in the survey which asked for their phone number for a follow-up interview. Each who was reached was typically interviewed within two weeks of filling out the survey. Interviews varied in length from 20 to 75 minutes. The survey was informally structured around the importance the participant placed on specific competencies, or comments made in their survey form. Participants were given the opportunity to comment on their view of the value of the project itself. The survey and interviews were engaged in October and November of 2006.
Findings
The findings of the project first look at the survey outcomes and subsequently (Part IV, below) at the gleanings from the interviews.
Part I: Background of the Survey Participants
The participants have clinical experience in 27 separate integrated care institutions. (Table 1.) Nearly three-fourths (73%) had over 3 years of experience in these settings, with 8 (31%) noting more than five years. Only 4 (15%) were in their first year in the integrated setting. (Table 2)
Of the group, 13 (50%) had some affiliation with an AOM school. (Table 3) Nearly as many, 12 (46%) noted an affiliation with conventional medical education . (Table 4) Of the set, 21 (81%) are certified by NCCAOM in acupuncture and 5 (19%) in Oriental medicine. One was also a licensed naturopathic doctor.
Part II: Specialized Training and Useful Resources
Only a minority of respondents responded affirmatively in any of the six categories which explored any specialized training that they may have received to prepare them for their work in integrated settings. (Table 5) Those responding in the affirmative typically provided information on the kinds of training which were helpful.
Table 1: Locations of Practices
Daniel Freeman (Marina) |
Daniel Freeman (Inglewood) |
Good Samaritan, LA |
One Sky Medicine |
One Sky Wellness Associates |
Community Health Centers of King County |
Shore Health System’s Center for Integrative Medicine |
University of Maryland Integrative Medicine |
Harborview Medical Center |
Sojourns Community Health Clinic |
Heartspring Wellness Center, Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center |
Venice Family Clinic |
Beth Israel Medical Center’s Continuum Center for Health and Healing |
Eleven Eleven Wellness Center |
University of Arizona Campus Health Services |
Canyon Ranch Health Resort, Medical Department |
Highline Hospital |
Cedars Sinai Medical Center |
Center for Integrative Medicine, George Wash. University |
Palmetto Baptist Medical Center |
Athens Regional Medical Center |
Oregon Health Sciences University |
Heartspring Wellness Center (Samaritan Health Services) |
Walter Reed Army Medical Center |
Banner Estrella Medical Center |
Kaiser Permanente, Northern California |
University of Arizona Medical Center |
Table 2: Experience in the Integrated Center/Hospital
Duration |
0-12 mo. |
13-2yr |
3-5 yr |
>5 years |
Total |
4 (15%) |
3 (12%) |
11 (42%) |
8 (31%) |
Table 3: AOM School Affiliation
Academy of Oriental Medicine at Austin |
Bastyr University (3 respondents) |
Tai Sophia Institute |
Emperors College |
Tri-State College of Acupuncture (2 respondents) |
Anglo-Dutch Institute of Oriental Medicine |
Asian Institute of Medical Studies |
Oregon College of Oriental Medicine |
Phoenix Institute of Herbal Medicine & Acupuncture |
Tucson program, not specifically named |
Table 4: Med School Affiliation
University of Maryland |
Baltimore VA Hospital |
University of Washington (2 respondents) |
UCLA (2 respondents) |
Albert Einstein Medical College/Beth Israel Medical Center (2 respondents) |
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (UCLA) |
George Washington University Med Center |
Oregon Health Sciences University |
University of Arizona |
Table 5: Specialized Training Notes by Participants
|
Yes |
No |
Hospital/clinic Did the clinic/hospital/institution provide any training to prepare you for your role? |
9 (36%) |
16 (64%) |
Reading/CD/DVD Is there reading and/or CD/DVD that you found particularly useful in preparing you for your work, or which you have since discovered? |
4 (16%) |
21 (84%) |
Web Resource Was there any website or web resource that was particularly useful to you, or which you have since discovered? |
10 (40%) |
15 (60%) |
Training/conference Was there any training/conference/class/seminar that has proved particularly useful in preparing you, or which you have since discovered? |
8 (32%) |
17 (68%) |
College or prof. assn Did your college or prof. association provide specialized training/seminar/sessions which proved particularly useful? |
9 (36%) |
16 (64%) |
Other resource Was there any other resource has been particularly useful to you, or which you have since discovered? |
11 (44%) |
14 (56%) |
Attitudes Were there attitudes among the health professionals with whom you work that have interfered with your ability to fully practice AOM in this setting? |
6 (26%) |
17 (76%) |
Two conferences in particular were cited as useful, those sponsored by the multi-disciplinary American Academy of Pain Management and the annual Health Forum/American Hospital Association conference on Integrative Medicine for Health Systems. A few participants noted specific courses in their acupuncture schools or programs of their professional associations.
Among the other resources noted were personal experience of the respondents in prior work with the system under a separate professional degree. No resource stood out as particularly remarkable. Only Acupuncture Today was mentioned more than once – two times – as a resource.
An additional query concerned attitudes among the other health professionals in the clinic which might have “interfered with your ability to practice AOM in this setting.” Just over one fourth (6/26%) marked yes. Most skepticism was described as being at the outset. Others noted a limit on treating pain conditions and an inability to use herbs.
Part 3: Key Topics in an Optimal Training
The third section of the written survey focused on ranking of 1-5 on a Likert scale (“not important” to “very important”) of 25 potential topics which might be in “an educational session to prepare AOM practitioners for practice in an integrated care environment.”
Of the 25 topics selected for ranking as to their importance (see Appendix 2):
Table 6: Viewed as Important or Very Important by Over 80% by Ranking
Topic Area
|
% |
Communication with MDs/nurses and other providers |
96% |
Communicating AOM concepts in a language which works with conventional practitioners |
91% |
Speaking-presentation skills to help build relationships |
89% |
Leadership skills to give my services a more effective presence |
88% |
Skills in articulating to the MDs/staff the value I offer patients |
88% |
Charting/documentation in a conventional environment |
88% |
Recognition of high priority acute management clinical presentations (red flag) |
88% |
Skills needed for multi-disciplinary collaboration |
85% |
Strategies/skills for developing relationships with MDs/Nurses to enhance referrals |
85% |
Useful medical language/medical terminology |
84% |
Assessment and evaluation of a conventional medical record |
83% |
Management & referral to conventional providers |
81% |
The participants were also given an opportunity to add topics that they felt were left out that might have been included. One topic noted, by a participant who works in an inpatient setting, was the ability to give dictation.
Part IV: Findings from the Interviews
The 19 interviews with participants varied in length from 20 to 75 minutes based on passions of the interviewees and the direction taken by the interview process. All were asked some basic questions: general perceptions around the value of the survey project, whether they thought there might be value in special training or a refresher course in the area, and specific content ideas that they would recommend including. The core intent was to gather their insights in order to pass them on to others.
The interviews yielded an array of general and specific ideas. These are captured below.
Ideas for Resources and Content from Participant Interviews
Note: The following capture many but not all of the diverse recommendations which came from the participant interviews.
Resources to Develop
Resources to Provide
Specific Content
For Those in In-patient Care
Communication Related
Two Additional Themes
The interviews elicited strong comments from a subset of participants in two areas which are worth noting:
The majority of participants expressed strong support for the project and the potential that new and focused resources might be available to others who are choosing to enter MD-dominant, integrated care environments.
Conclusions
The AOM participants in the project indicated that, as representatives of the AOM profession inside conventional healthcare delivery institutions, they had the basic clinical and inter-personal competencies to survive and, for many, to thrive.
Yet at the same time, few felt they were, or are yet, enabled by a full set of knowledge, skills and competencies which might allow them to create an optimal place for AOM in these environments. The vast majority entered their clinical positions with little focused training. They have been classic pioneers, learning on the hoof.
Some participants argued that the situation today is different than that captured in the survey because AOM education for work in integrated environments in 2006 is significantly better than an earlier era. If so, the need and even usefulness of such programs may not be as high for current graduates than for those who graduated 5 or more years ago. If so, the primary beneficiaries of focused educational projects would be earlier graduates who are considering new work in integrative settings.
If we proceed from the perspective that the issues identified by these participants reflect the likely interests and needs of most others in the profession, this project has significant value. The survey and interview findings serve to clarify critical competencies which support integrated care practice. Some existing resources are identified. An array of potentially helpful but not yet developed resources are described. Educators are directed toward the kinds of content which will assist in preparing such practitioners,
The project findings suggests that the there is value from additional investment in developing the resources and programs noted in this report. The beneficiaries will not only be the AOM practitioners who are learning to work in new environments. Benefits can be anticipated to flow to the patients they are seeking to serve.
Appendix 1: Notes on Specialized Training/Learning
Note: Each participant was numbered for the purpose of maintaining anonymity.
|
What |
Hospital/clinic
Did the clinic/ hospital/ institution provide any training to prepare you for your role? |
|
Reading/CD/ DVD
Is there reading and/or CD/DVD that you found particularly useful in preparing you for your work, or which you have since discovered? |
|
Web Resource
Was there any website or web resource that was particularly useful to you, or which you have since discovered? |
|
Training/ conference
Was there any training/ conference/class/ seminar that has proved particularly useful in preparing you, or which you have since discovered? |
|
College or prof. assn
Did your college or prof. association provide specialized training/ seminar/ sessions which proved particularly useful? |
|
Other resource
Was there any other resource has been particularly useful to you, or which you have since discovered? |
|
Attitudes
Were there attitudes among the health professionals with whom you work that have interfered with your ability to fully practice AOM in this setting? |
|
Other comments: Many years of practicing and teaching; I believe I was chosen for the hospital position due to my 15 years of experience in the Pharmacy. The hospital felt I might be more capable of communicating with the Western Physicians on staff.
Appendix 2: Importance of Specific Topics in an Optimal Training Program
If you were to provide an educational session meant to prepare AOM practitioners for practice in an integrated environment, please note the importance of these topics:
Key: 1= Not important, 3 = Somewhat important, 5 = Very important, NA = Not applicable
# |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5
|
NA |
1 |
Credentialing processes and procedures |
0 |
1 (4%) |
11 (42%) |
5 (19%) |
9 (35%) |
0 |
2 |
Charting/documentation in a conventional environment |
0 |
0 |
2 (8%) |
5 (19%) |
18 (69%) |
1 (4%) |
3 |
Useful medical language/medical terminology |
1 (4%) |
0 |
3 (12%) |
4 (15%) |
18 (69%) |
0 |
4 |
Communication with MDs/nurses and other providers |
0 |
0 |
1 (4%) |
7 (27%) |
18 (69%) |
0 |
5 |
Liability issues |
1 (4%) |
2 (8%) |
6 (23%) |
5 (19%) |
12 (46%) |
0 |
6 |
Management & referral to conventional Providers |
0 |
0 |
5 (19%) |
8 (31%) |
13 (50%) |
0 |
7 |
Quality assurance and quality improvement processes |
0 |
2 (8%) |
4 (16%) |
10 (40%) |
8 (32%) |
1 (4%) |
8 |
Insurance/payment and billing issues |
1 (4%) |
4 (15%) |
9 (35%) |
7 (27%) |
5 (19%) |
0 |
9 |
Outcomes studies and documentation |
0 |
5 (19%) |
5 (19%) |
11 (42%) |
5 (19%) |
0 |
10 |
Research methodology and grant-writing |
1 (4%) |
5 (20%) |
9 (36%) |
6 (24%) |
3 (12%) |
1 (4%) |
11 |
Skills in articulating to the MDs/staff the value I offer patients |
0 |
2 (8%) |
1 (4%) |
6 (23%) |
17 (65%) |
0 |
12 |
Facility with the scientific literature which might support broader use of my services |
1 (4%) |
2 (8%) |
6 (23%) |
5 (19%) |
12 (46%) |
0 |
13 |
Cross-cultural communication |
0 |
1 (4%) |
7 (28%) |
8 (32%) |
9 (36%) |
0 |
14 |
Strategies/skills for developing relationships with MDs/Nurses to enhance referrals |
1 (4%) |
0 |
3 (12%) |
6 (23%) |
16 (62%) |
0 |
15 |
Skills needed for multi-disciplinary collaboration |
0 |
0 |
4 (15%) |
7 (27%) |
15 (58%) |
0 |
16 |
Recognition of high priority acute management clinical presentations (red flag) |
0 |
1 (4%) |
1 (4%) |
3 (12%) |
19 (76%) |
1 (4%) |
17 |
Leadership skills to give my services a more effective presence |
0 |
1 (4%) |
2 (8%) |
14 (56%) |
8 (32%) |
0 |
18 |
Communicating AOM concepts in a language which works with conventional practitioners |
1 (4%) |
1 (4%) |
0 |
8 (33%) |
14 (58%) |
0 |
19 |
Speaking-presentation skills to help build relationships |
0 |
0 |
3 (16%) |
8 (31%) |
15 (58%) |
0 |
20 |
Knowledge of the skills, competencies and training of other practitioners (such as DC, DO, MD, RN, ND, PT, OT, etc.) |
0 |
0 |
6 (24%) |
6 (24%) |
13 (52%) |
0 |
21 |
The roles of other healthcare personnel such as medical technologists, nurses assistants, nurses, etc. |
0 |
2 (8%)
|
9 (35%) |
9 (35%) |
6 (23%) |
0 |
22 |
Fluency in “evidence-based medicine” |
1 (4%) |
2 (8%) |
8 (31%) |
9 (35%) |
6 (23%) |
0 |
23 |
Assessment and evaluation of a conventional medical record |
0 |
0 |
4 (17%) |
7 (29%) |
13 (54%) |
0 |
24 |
Negotiation/mediation skills |
0 |
2 (8%) |
13 (52%) |
4 (16%) |
5 (20%) |
0 |
25 |
Management & referral to other CAM providers |
0
|
2 (8%) |
4 (17%) |
12 (50%) |
6 (25%) |
0 |
Appendix 3: All Additional Notes on Other Knowledge, Skills or Attitudes as Provided by Participants
Note: These include comments at the end and comments inserted by some respondents after specific questions. The reason there is a Participant #28 is that two participants who filled out the survey did not have requisite integrative clinical experience. Their responses were not included.
Participant #2
Participant #4
Participant #6
Participant #7
Participant #10
Participant #12
Participant #13
Participant #15
Participant #16
Participant #17
Participant #23
Participant #24
Participant #25
Participant #26
Participant #28
Other knowledge, skills, etc.
Appendix 4: Survey Instrument
Survey of Licensed Acupuncturists to Gather Information on Competencies for Practice in Hospitals, Integrated Centers
and Other Conventional Healthcare Settings
We anticipate that the time required per practitioner will be 15-30 minutes, for the written survey, and 15-30 minutes for the interview. While your written surveys will be used as the basis for your oral interview, none of the specifics of your survey and interview process will be shared in the project report, in a way that will link back to you, without your prior approval. Basic contact is johnweeks@theintegratorblog.com
Sponsorship: This survey is a project of the National Education Dialogue to Advance Integrated Health Care: Creating Common Ground (NED) and the Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care (ACCAHC). The survey is funded through a grant from the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (NCCAOM). NED is a project of the Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium (http://ihpc.info/).
Project Description and Goal: Creating the optimal role for acupuncture and Oriental medicine in conventional medical settings, such as hospitals and integrative clinics, may be facilitated by certain competencies. These may have been unknown to, or under-developed in, some licensed AOM practitioners who are interested in practicing in these facilities. The goal of this survey project is to glean from AOM practitioners who are experienced in these settings the types of competencies and tools which will best prepare other AOM professionals for making the most of these integrated care opportunities.
Individuals Surveyed: The project will receive completed surveys, and then carry out oral interviews, with roughly 25 experienced AOM practitioners. We are targeting practitioners in hospitals, those involved with AOM schools with DOM programs, and practitioners who work with clinics associated with institutions which are part of the Consortium of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine (http://www.imconsortium.org/).
1. Basic information
First name:
Last name:
Phone contact for follow-up interview:
Is it okay to share your email with the NCCAOM, AAOM or AOM Alliance, CCAOM
should they find this list of LAcs useful for some project (Y or N) :
List all professional degrees and licenses (MA, DAOM, MS, ND, RN, etc.)
List all professional licenses (LAc, RN, massage, etc.)
Note certifications (XX if yes):
Dipl OM (NCCAOM) :
Dipl Ac (NCCAOM) :
Other:
Name of Conventional Hospital(s) or Center(s) where you practice(d).
A. Name:
Experience: ___0-12 mo ____13mo-2 yr ___ 3-5 years ____> 5years
B. Name:
Experience: ___ 0-12 mo ___ 13mo-2 yr ___ 3-5 years ____> 5years
Do you have an AOM school affiliation?
Yes:
No:
If Yes, please name:
Your Title/Position(s):
Do you have a conventional academic medical center affiliation?
Yes:
No:
If Yes, please name:
Your Title/Position(s):
II. Specialized training/learning to prepare you for this position, or which you have since engaged.
A. Did the clinic/hospital/institution provide any training to prepare you for your role?
Yes
No
If yes, what in particular was useful:
B. Is there reading and/or CD/DVD(s) that you found particularly useful in preparing you for your work, or which you have since discovered?
Yes
No
If yes, please list/describe:
C. Was there any website or web resource that was particularly useful to you, or which you have since discovered??
Yes
No
If yes, please list/describe:
D. Was there any training/conference/class/seminar that has proved particularly useful in preparing you, or which you have since discovered?
Yes
No
If yes, please describe:
E. Did your college or professional association provide specialized training/seminar/sessions which proved particularly useful?
Yes
No
If yes, please describe:
F. Was there any other resource has been particularly useful to you, or which you have since discovered?
Yes
No
If yes, please describe:
G. Were there attitudes among the health professionals with whom you work that have interfered with your ability to fully practice AOM in this setting?
Yes
No
If yes, please describe:
III. Creating an Optimal Training Program
If you were to provide an educational session meant to prepare AOM practitioners for practice in an integrated environment, please note the importance of these topics:
1. Credentialing processes and procedures
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
2. Charting/documentation in a conventional environment
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
3. Useful medical language/medical terminology
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
4. Communication with MDs/nurses and other providers
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
5. Liability issues
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
6. Management & referral to Conventional Providers
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
7. Quality assurance and quality improvement processes
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
important Important Important
8. Insurance/payment and billing issues
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
9. Outcomes studies and documentation
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
10. Research methodology and grant-writing
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
11. Skills in articulating to the MDs/staff the value I offer patients
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
12. Facility with the scientific literature which might support broader use of my services
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
13. Cross-cultural communication
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
14. Strategies/skills for developing relationships with MDs/Nurses to enhance referrals
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
15. Skills needed for multi-disciplinary collaboration
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
16. Recognition of high priority acute management clinical presentations (red flag)
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
17. Leadership skills to give my services a more effective presence
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
18. Communicating AOM concepts in a language which works with conventional practitioners
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
19. Speaking-presentation skills to help build relationships
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
20. Knowledge of the skills, competencies and training of other practitioners (such as DC, DO, MD, RN, ND, PT, OT, etc.)
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
21. The roles of other healthcare personnel such as medical technologists, nurses assistants, nurses, etc.
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
22. Fluency in “evidence-based medicine”
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
23. Assessment and evaluation of a conventional medical record
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
24. Negotiation/mediation skills
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
25. Management & referral to other CAM providers
_____ ______ _______ _______ _______ _______
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
Not Somewhat Very Not apply
important Important Important
IV. Please note any other additional knowledge, skills or attitudes which you think would be important parts of such a training session
Any additional comments (use as much space as necessary):
Please email to John Weeks/NED johnweeks@theintegratorblog.com or mail to 3345 59th Avenue SW, Seattle, WA 98116; 206-932-3899 Thank you for your time & participation!